Attentive effort as the material of human connection.
This is the fifth and last post in Definition of Zen-Wu. The first post described the failure that started the company's work, and the three after it set out Zen-Wu's form and argued for it. That leaves the question the series has held back. What is Zen-Wu, as a company, for?
The answer lies in what the tools let a woodworker make, and in what those things do after they leave the bench.
· · ·
A friend sits with someone through an illness. A parent reads a child's face before the child speaks. A teacher rereads a student's paragraph three times to find what was meant. Each is attentive effort held toward someone else, against the pull of whatever the person would otherwise be doing. Where human connection is real, it is made of this.
Shared opinion, proximity, affection and history give occasion for attentive effort, and the effort makes the connection. Work that demands attentive effort day after day trains a habit of attending, and the habit carries into how the worker attends to other people.
Chinese has a short name for what these paragraphs describe: 参物 (cān wù), engagement with the material. 参 is the act of attentive entering-with; 物 is the concrete thing attended to. Attentive effort, as the phrase is used here, is the integral of 参物 over time. This company is built on one case of 参物, in which the thing attended to is wood and the attention reaches it through a sharp edge. There are others (clay, ink, iron, stone). Ours happens to be this one.
· · ·
The previous post made the biological case for edge-work as an ancient human specialization: the anatomy of the hand, the brain's investment in controlling it, and the presence of cutting tools in every known culture. The human hand was shaped, in part, by what sharp tools demand.
Edge-work has also been, for as long as there have been humans, a social technology. After food and shelter, making things with sharp tools, and making the tools themselves, are among the oldest and most widespread forms of sustained attentive effort our species has carried out. A knapped flake, a ground blade, a hollowed bowl and a joined box are useful objects, and each also holds the hours of attention that went into it. Many of them were made to be given.
Marcel Mauss built much of his 1925 essay The Gift on a single Māori statement, given by Tamati Ranapiri to the ethnographer Elsdon Best. A taonga, a valued possession such as a fine mat or an heirloom, carries hau, which Mauss read as a spirit of the gift that wants to return to where it came from. Whoever passes a taonga on owes something back. The taonga moves, given, received and given again, and each exchange binds giver and receiver into obligations that neither chose alone.
Mauss treated the Māori statement as the clearest form of a pattern he traced through Samoa, the kula ring of the Trobriand Islands and the potlatch of the Pacific Northwest. In each, valuables, many of them made by hand, moved through obligation, and sometimes through open rivalry.
In a pre-industrial village, much of what a person wore or held had been made by someone nearby. Cloth came from a known weaver, a bowl from a potter with a name, a spoon or a hairpin was carved at home. Much of it was bought and sold, but the maker was rarely a stranger, and the attention that went into a thing stayed attached to a person the user could name.
· · ·
A serious woodworker nearly always makes for someone. The board on the bench is going to someone else's kitchen. The chair is for a child, the tool chest for an apprentice, a son or daughter, a student. Even a piece meant for the maker's own house will in time be handled by others, eaten off, slept in, handed down, given away.
When the work is well made, its quality leaves the bench with it. A surface a sharp edge has entered differs from one a dull edge has crushed, and a joint that closes tight on glue alone differs from one that needs epoxy to bridge a gap. Those differences go with the object into its new home, where the recipient meets them each time the box is opened or the chair is pulled out.
· · ·
If craft work ends in the relations the made thing enters, a toolmaker's job is to let the woodworker's attentive effort arrive cleanly in the object: a joint that holds, a surface that keeps its character, an edge that stays sharp long enough for the maker's attention to go into the wood instead of into a fight with the blade.
What Zen-Wu is finally for is the web of giving that Mauss described in one place and traced in many, which people keep reweaving from the things they make and give. We make sharp tools so that the woodworker's effort arrives in the work. What happens to the work after it leaves the bench is out of our hands, and it is the reason we make the tools.
· · ·
Definition of Zen-Wu
- The Mist Line
- On Form
- The Axiom
- What the Hand Knows
- What the Tool Sharpens
0 comments